Updated: January 13, 2023
The RSAF provides seed funding of up to $10,000 for early-stage research. The award is designed to improve the competitiveness of external grant applications submitted by full time UTM faculty members. Preference will be given to those proposals that demonstrate strong potential to generate future external support.
The opportunity is available to faculty members with a full-time continuing status appointment (tenure or teaching stream) at UTM. RSAF funds must be administered through a UTM unit; in the case of applications involving groups of faculty the lead applicant must be a UTM faculty member.
Successful applicants will be eligible to reapply for funding 24 months following the competition deadline in which they were successful.
Adjudication Process & Evaluation Criteria:
The UTM Research Council—a multi-disciplinary group that includes one representative from each academic unit—is responsible for adjudicating the RSAF applications.
Each individual RSAF application will be reviewed and ranked by five members of the UTM Research Council: three reviewers from the applicant’s broad discipline (humanities, social sciences, or sciences, as specified on the application cover sheet), and one reviewer from each of the other disciplines.
To be successful, applicants must write their applications for non-specialist reviewers. Proposals written in a highly specialized or technical prose will receive a lower ranking.
Proposal Elements and Adjudication Criteria:
1. Project Description (60%)
Describe your research project using non-specialist language, with a focus on four sections: a) the objectives of the research and their significance; b) the context for the research (with brief reference to literature review and theoretical approach); c) methodology; and d) expected outcomes. This section of the application should be c. 1.75 pages, single spaced. You may add an additional, optional one page for references, bibliography, and/or works cited.
2. Leveragability (20%)
In this section (c. 1/4 page), indicate to the multi-disciplinary reviewers how the RSAF award will improve your future competitiveness in a specific external funding competition, such as SSHRC, CIHR, or NSERC. This grant is designed to support new research, rather than existing funded research programs. If you currently hold a Tri-Council award as Applicant, please indicate how the proposed research differs from your current funded research. RSAF proposals that are difficult to distinguish from existing funded research projects will not receive funding.
3. Budget (20%)
On a separate page (1 page maximum) include an itemized budget and justification. Explain how the requested funds will help you achieve the project objectives. In cases where your overall project budget exceeds the RSAF maximum, explain where you will access these other funds. Be sure to provide specific figures for all costs, with reference to how you’ve calculated the expense. Standard Tri-Council expense eligibility requirements will apply. The UTM Research Council may recommend a lower amount of funding than requested.
Please note: the OVPR maintains a shared folder of successful Tri-Council grants, which RSAF applicants are welcome to access if you are interested in seeing models of project descriptions using non-specialist language. To receive access, please contact email@example.com.
The RSAF Application:
A complete, maximum 4-page application must be submitted by the competition deadline as a single PDF document, using standard typeface and spacing. The RSAF application package must include:
- Cover Sheet (1 page)
- Funding Proposal (must include Project Description and Leveragability; 2-page maximum; an optional References/Works Cited on an additional 1 page)
- Budget & Justification (1-page maximum)
Applications for the next competition are due by 11pm on Monday, 13 February 2023 (firm deadline). Please submit proposals in one SINGLE pdf file to Rong Wu (firstname.lastname@example.org) by this date.
Results will be emailed to the RSAF applicants by the Office of the Vice-Principal, Research (OVPR). Individual scores/rankings cannot be provided, but if reviewers provide comments in their adjudication documents, that feedback can be shared with applicants upon request.
Successful RSAF awards will be transferred to the UTM faculty member’s commitment fund centre (CFC) following the receipt of any necessary certifications (see below).
Certifications: University certifications for research using human subjects, animal subjects, or biohazards are required (as necessary) before funds can be transferred. Certifications need not be appended at the time of application; however, funding cannot be released until confirmation of the necessary certification is received by the OVPR.
Requirement: Upon acceptance of the RSAF funds, successful applicants will be required to participate in at least two proposal reviews for subsequent OVPR-adjudicated funding competitions (e.g., RSAF, OCCF, Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship Program, UTM Postdoctoral Fellowship Award, UTM/Jackman Humanities Institute Annual Seminar, UTM Working Group).
Final Report: RSAF recipients must submit a 1-2 paragraph final report describing the impact of the award on the recipient's research program. This statement could also briefly describe what was accomplished with the funding and how the funds were expended and should be sent to the OVPR no later than one year following a successful application. Failure to submit a final report could result in funds being withheld in a subsequent RSAF competition for which you are applying.
Acknowledgment: The UTM affiliation of researchers and support from the OVPR should be acknowledged in any research outputs arising from this award.