Advancing Academic Advising Project

Overview

The Advancing Academic Advising Project (3AP) is a campus-wide collaboration to create a best-in-class academic advising system. The project is sponsored by Professor Bill Gough, UTM's Interim Vice-Principal, Academic and led by Brian Ingoldsby, Senior Project Manager in the UTM Campus Project Management Office.

Goals for the project include:

  1. Identifying a goal state for UTM's academic advising program;
  2. Developing recommendations and an implementation plan for achieving that goal state;
  3. Significantly involving UTM community stakeholders to support enhancement activities.

The first phase of the project, focused on identifying a goal state for UTM’s academic advising program and recommendations for advancing to that state, began in the fall of 2023 and culminated in the 3AP Recommendations Sub-Project Final Report being delivered to university leadership in the summer of 2024.

Phase II of the project, focused on recommendation implementation, launched in the fall of 2024 and is currently underway.
 

Learn more: 
 

Phase One

Complete

Learn more

Phase Two

Currently underway

Learn more

Executive Steering Committee

 

Anuar_150px_.jpg

Anuar Rodrigues
Executive Director, Strategy

Tim Fricker_150px.jpg

Tim Fricker
Interim Dean of Student Affairs and Assistant Principal

William Gough_150px.jpg

William Gough
Interim Vice-Principal, 
Academic & Dean


Phase One: Identifying a Goal State


Project Team & Activities

  • Brian Ingoldsby, Senior Projects Manager, Project Management Office
  • Felicity Morgan, Director, Career Centre, UTM Career Centre
  • Jessica Silver, Director, Student Engagement, Centre for Student Engagement
  • Pascal Michelucci, Professor, Department of Language Studies
  • Sandra Ngan, Senior Projects Manager, Project Management Office
  • Sharon Marjadsingh, Academic Advisor and Program Administrator, Department of Historical Studies
  • Svitlana Frunchak, Assistant Registrar, Academic Advising Services, Office of the Registrar
  • Olha Fihol, Assistant Registrar, Registrarial Services, Office of the Registrar

Project Team activities focused on: engaging in extensive community consultation; leading the Project’s seven (7) working groups (involving over 65 community members); facilitating communication and change management activities; and investing in group learning and development.  

Working Groups 

In alignment with the goal of engaging and leveraging the expertise of UTM community members to the greatest extent possible, the Advancing Academic Advising Project (3AP) organized over 65 community members into 7 working groups, each responsible for reviewing and making recommendations related to a particular aspect of UTM’s academic advising program. 

The seven working group areas included:

The Programs and Services Working Group is tasked with reviewing and making recommendations related to the academic advising programs (services) delivered to and experienced by students. Examples of topics this group is exploring include:

  • Goals for our academic advising program
  • The extent to which existing programs and services are achieving our goals
  • How programming decisions are being made
  • Recommended/required policies

Community members serving on this group include:

  • Jessica Silver, Director, Student Engagement 
  • Michelle Kraus, Associate Registrar, Academic Standards, Advising & Financial Aid 
  • Amanda Luongo, Assistant Director, Residence Life 
  • Brett Beston, Associate Professor and Associate Chair, Psychology 
  • Dray Perenic, Academic Advisor 
  • Kerrie Martin, Program Manager & Learning Strategist 
  • Natasha Hanif, Academic Advisor 
  • Panayiota Platanitis, Career Counsellor 
  • Laura Ferlito, Academic Advisor & Undergraduate Program Administrator 
  • Samuel Ronfard, Assistant Professor 
  • Krystle Shannon, Student 
  • Fairly Wong, Student

The Assessment Working Group is tasked with reviewing and making recommendations related to our programs use of assessment to guide practice. 

Community members serving on this working group include: 

  • Pascal Michelucci, Professor 
  • Silvana Miller, Senior Project Specialist, Reporting and Analytics 
  • Kristina McCutcheon, Academic Advisor 
  • Chrystal Colquhoun, Data and Assessment Analyst 
  • Jonathan Davis, Research and Assessment Analyst 
  • Sara da Silva, Assistant Director, Academic Planning, Policy and Projects 
  • Madison Peters, Manager, ACE@UTM 
  • Rosa Ciantar, Academic Advisor 
  • Cindy Short, Program and Curriculum Support 
  • Razia Saleh, Student 
  • Kareena Kailass, Student 

While many working groups are exploring the inclusivity of aspects of our academic advising program, the Equity, Diversity, Inclusion & Indigeneity Working Group is specifically focused on reviewing our academic advising program from an EDI&I lens and making recommendations as to how academic advising at UTM may be enhanced to support the success of all students. 

Community members serving on this working group include: 

  • Sharon Marjadsingh, Academic Advisor and Program Administrator, Historical Studies 
  • Rebeca Mahadeo, Supervisor, Intercultural Fluency and International Student Development, International Education Centre 
  • Brian Cunha, Director, Student Housing and Residence Life 
  • Aimy Lieu, Assistant Director, Institute for the Study of University Pedagogy 
  • Ruhina Shaikh, Resource Centre Coordinator, UTM Career Centre 
  • Kaitlin Phillips, Indigenous Student Support Specialist, Office of Indigenous Initiatives 
  • Kayla Forrester, Undergraduate Advisor, Department of Economics 
  • Noor Leghari, Equity Project Specialist – Sciences, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Office 
  • Ghishawa Ishfaq, Student 
  • Somtochukwu Nnakenyi, Student

The Advising Staff Working Group is focused on reviewing and making recommendations related to the experiences of advising staff, including: their recruitment, training, on-going professional development; well-being; and support structures/avenues for voice and representation.

Community members serving on this working group include:

  • Sveta Frunchak, Assistant Registrar, Academic Advising Services, Office of the Registrar 
  • Monica Seymour, Assistant Director, Human Resources 
  • Cristina Puha, Assistant Director, International Student Supports, International Education Centre 
  • Kwame Diko, Manager, Diversity Student Recruitment and Admissions, Office of the Registrar 
  • Megan Janssen, Undergraduate Advisor, English and Drama 
  • Sheri Browne, Assistant Director, Career Development Unit, UTM Career Centre 
  • Truc Tran, Undergraduate Program Coordinator, Institute of Communication, Culture, Information & Technology
  • Jane Medeiros, Undergraduate Advisor, Department of Philosophy 

The Communications Working Group is focused on reviewing marketing and communication activities related to academic advising at UTM and making recommendations as to how such activities may be enhanced. Examples of questions the group will be seeking to answer include:  

  • To what extent are current marketing and communication efforts working?
  • Do our students know what we want them to know?  
  • Are best practices in place that support communication effectiveness?

Community members serving on this working group include: 

  • Sandra Ngan, Senior Project Manager, Project Management Office 
  • Patricia Lonergan, Interim Director, Marketing and Communications, Office of Communications
  • Jeff Espie, Director, Vice-Presidential Communications, Office of the Vice-President & Principal 
  • Jenny Dahany, Supervisor, Pre-Arrival Engagement, Centre for Student Engagement 
  • Judy Duff, Registered Nurse and Campus Health Promoter, Health & Counselling Centre 
  • Michael Gomez, Manager, Student Recruitment Communications, Student Recruitment & Admissions
  • Joanna Szurmak, Interim Associate Librarian, Library & Learning Services, UTM Library 
  • Laura Smith, Outreach and Engagement Coordinator, Robert Gillespie Academic Skills Centre (RGASC)
  • Sebastian Santoni Perez De Obanos, Student 

The Systems and Technology Working Group is tasked with reviewing and making recommendations related to the systems and technology that support academic advising at UTM. Specifically, the group is exploring:

  • Technology availability and use
  • User training and access 
  • Technology integration 
  • Compliance and security

Community members serving on this working group include: 

  • Olha Fihol, Assistant Registrar, Registrarial Services, Office of the Registrar 
  • Anthony Betts, Director, Information & Instructional Technology Services  
  • Cesar Mejia, Associate Registrar, Systems, Scheduling and Examinations, Office of the Registrar 
  • Chad Nuttall, Assistant Dean, Students and International Initiatives, Student Affairs and Services 
  • Lynne Hsueh, Assistant Registrar, Student Records & Registration, Office of the Registrar 
  • Ferzeen Sammy, Academic Advisor, Department of Geography, Geomatics and Environment 
  • Jose Chacon, Business and Operations Coordinator, Career Centre 
  • Yan Tam-Seguin, Project Manager, Student Affairs and Services 
  • Kate Romanow, Academic Advisor, Office of the Registrar 
  • Abdirisaq Gedleh, Student
  • Safah Asghar, Student

The Space and Environment Working Group is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations related to the  locations and spaces in which academic advising occurs . Examples of topics the group will be considering include:  

  • Accessibility 
  • Privacy 
  • Proximity/location
  • Signage

Community members serving on this working group include: 

  • Felicity Morgan, Director, Career Centre 
  • Monika Farrell, Assistant Director, Planning and Design, Facilities Management & Planning 
  • Jose Chacon, Business and Operations Coordinator, Career Centre 
  • Yan Tam-Seguin, Project Manager, Student Affairs and Services 
  • Stephanie do Rego, Assistant to the Chair/Undergraduate Assistant, Department of Biology 
  • Melanie Peters, Financial and Academic Advisor, Office of the Registrar 
  • Bubu Zhao, Student 
  • Taha Imran, Student 


Phase Two - Recommendations Implementation

Recommendation implementation activities completed, currently underway, or soon-to-be underway, as of the Fall 2025 semester, include:

  • Increasing academic advising capacity in the Office of the Registrar (Priority Recommendation 1).
  • Organizing a team of faculty and staff to further explore UTM’s academic advising model and develop plans as to the best path forward for the division (Priority Recommendation 2).
  • Refreshing UTM’s Academic Advising Community of Practice (AACoP), to support its ability to provide academic advisors: community; voice; role-specific training; and professional development opportunities (Priority Recommendation 4a).
  • Formalizing connection opportunities for the leaders of academic advising and other student support units, to increase inter-unit activities and support holistic advising (Priority Recommendation 4b).
  • Implementing the Student Advising Service (Salesforce) product, to provide advising staff with access to comprehensive student advising records and enhanced referral functionality and students a single hub for accessing academic advising (Priority Recommendation 7a).
  • Streamlining academic advising-related communication, including on a new advising website (Priority Recommendation 8).
  • Exploring developing consistent branding/signage that will make it easier for students to locate advisor offices (Priority Recommendation 9).
  • Designing and implementing proactive and holistic academic advising pilots that leverage predictive analytics to identify students who would benefit from additional support (Priority Recommendation 10b, 10c & 10d).

Advising Pilots 

In alignment with recommendations to provide increased proactive and holistic advising, increase our “early alert” capabilities, and provide enhanced support to students experiencing POSt challenges, pilots completed, underway, and planned include: 


Purpose: To improve outcomes for new students with low first-term GPAs.

Target: F24 new-to-UTM students with a GPA of 1.85 or lower following the Fall 2024 term.

Scope & Organization: Just over 1000 eligible students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 

  • Group A - access to existing supports
  • Group B - access to existing supports, plus proactive, personalized emails
  • Group C - access to existing supports plus an assigned advisor, providing holistic and proactive advising, including access to timely 1on1 appointments. 

Timeline: Late February -Late August, 2025 

Assessment: Assessing impact on: 

  • Engagement in academic advising
  • GPA/academic standing
  • Retention to F26 semester  

Purpose: To reduce the risk of academic suspension among students placed on probation following their initial session. 

Target: F24 new-to-UTM students placed on academic probation following the F2/W25 session. 

Scope & Organization: Targeted 348 eligible students. 

  • Students enrolled in Pilot #1 continued receiving their assigned treatment group.
  • Eligible students that were not eligible for Pilot #1 were placed in Group C. 

Timeline: Summer 2025

Assessment: Assessing impact on: 

  • GPA/academic standing
  • Retention to F26 semester
  • S25 credit completion 

Results not yet available. 

Purpose: To increase successful POSt enrolment for first-year students on academic probation. 

Target: F24 new-to-UTM students placed on academic probation following the F24/W25 session, who are:

  • eligible for POSt; and
  • were refused from a Type 2/3 program and/or lack a viable program combination following Round 1

Scope & Organization: Targeted 148 eligible students. 

Students enrolled in Pilot #1 continued receiving their assigned treatment group. 

Eligible students that were not eligible for Pilot #1 were placed in Group C.

Timeline: Mid June -- Late August, 2025

Assessment: Assessing impact on: 

  • Program enrolment as of July, 2025
  • Retention to F26 semester

Results not yet available. 

Purpose: To reduce summer melt and increase first-year success.

Target: F25 incoming students in Social Sciences, Commerce, or Management whose entrance average falls in the lower half of their admission category.

Scope & Organization: Approximately 928 students were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 

  • Group A - access to existing supports. 

Group B - access to existing supports plus proactive, personalized milestone- and outcome-based communication; an assigned advisor; and a suite of interactive success-focused programming

Students enrolled in Pilot #1 continued receiving their assigned treatment group. 

Eligible students that were not eligible for Pilot #1 were placed in Group C.

Timeline: July, 2025 – Summer 2026

Assessment: Assessing impact on: 

  • Engagement with academic advising
  • Engagement with pre-arrival supports
  • Select enrolment milestones
  • GPA/academic standing
  • Retention 

Results not yet available. 

Purpose: To improve outcomes for new students with low first-term GPAs.

Target: Additional details currently being confirmed

Scope & Organization: Additional details currently being confirmed

Timeline: January – August, 2026 

Assessment: Assessing impact on: 

  • Engagement with academic advising
  • Engagement with relevant support programs
  • GPA/academic standing
  • Retention 

Community Update

Check out the:

For more information: 
Brian Ingoldsby
Senior Project Manager
utm.pmo@utoronto.ca


Supported strategic priorities: