Tactics and Vectors 98/99
                           

Home

Table of  Contents

Great Circle Hypotheis  

Magnetoclinic Hypothesis

Magnetic-Latitude Hypothesis

Compass Bearings Hypothesis

Suns' Azimuth Hypothesis

Expansion-Contraction Hypothesis

Always Advance Hypothesis

Never Go Back Hypothesis

 

 

Analyses of Pooled Field Data: Hypothesis Testing


Hypothesis testing:  Comparsions of  the Mean Bearings to theoretical bearings, or theoretical directions, for the pooled data for the 1978, 1979, and 1981 Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migrations in southern Ontario 

¦ Up   ¦ Tables:  ¦ I,   IIIII,   IVVVIVII,  VIII aVIII bIXX,  XI,  XII  ¦


left arrowarrow leftTable VIII b*

Hypothesis:  Mean Bearings of migrating D. plexippus cannot be distinguished from the upwind direction for each wind condition.     
   
Confidence intervals were used to compare mean bearings for migrants to both the Upwind Bearing and the Upwind Sector for eight wind conditions 

Directional data were grouped according to wind direction at the time of the observation.


Mean Bearing ± 95% Confidence Intervals overlaps with the Upwind:


Wind

Number

Mean Bearing

95% C.I.

Bearing
(direction)

Sector
(range)


North

  53  

          185°  (S)

±8°

NO
360°  (N)

NO
(>337.5° to 022.5°)

Northeast

  64 

          229°  (SW)

±7°

NO
045°  (NE)

NO
(>022.5° to 067.5°)

East

150 

          247°  (WSW)

±5°

NO
090°  (E)

NO
(>067.5° to 112.5°)

Southeast

131 

          257°  (WSW)

±5°

NO
135°  (SE)

NO
(>112.5° to 157.5°)

South

  15  

          237°  (WSW)

   ±39°

NO
180°  (S)

YES
(>157.5° to 202.5°)

Southwest

  35  

          143°  (SE)

   ±52°

NO
225° (SW)

NO
(>202.5° to 247.5°)

West

  20  

          128°  (SE)

  ±29°

NO
270°  (W)

NO
(>247.5° to 292.5°)

Northwest

107 

          153°  (SSE)

±5°

NO
315°  (NW)

NO
(>292.5° to 337.5°)

Population

575  

          222°  (SW)

±5°


* Adapted from Gibo, D. L.,  1990

Definitions of abbreviations and symbols:  N = North, NE = Northeast,  E = East,  S = South, SW = Southwest, WSW = West-Southwest, etc., C.I. = Confidence Intervals. 

Conclusions

  1. The null hypothesis is rejected for upwind bearings for all wind conditions.  In each case, the mean direction of displacement of the butterflies was not aligning with the upwind bearing.

  2. The null hypothesis is rejected for upwind sectors (compass arcs) for all wind conditions except South  winds.  The butterflies have a significant tendency to fly upwind in South winds. 

Comments

  1. The results were fairly clear.  Migrating D. plexippus tend not to fly directly upwind in southern Ontario.  Even when the upwind direction is defined in terms of wind sector (compass arcs), the butterflies tend to fly upwind only in South winds.

  2. The length of a compass arc defining a wind sector was 45°.  The downwind bearing was the bearing at the midpoint of the downwind sector.  For example, the Bearing of a North wind was 360° and the downwind sector extends 22.5° on either size, or from 337.5° to 022.5°.    

  3. Defining D. plexippus that landed, usually on vegetation, as non-migrants excluded most observations of individuals that were flying upwind.

  4. The results for the South wind group should be considered tentative because of its small sample size, large angular variance and wide Confidence Intervals.

  5. Testing the Hypothesis, either by using the midpoint bearing for the  the wind, or by using wind sectors, results in a reduction in precision.  Ideally, the data should be grouped according to wind sector for each observation, upwind direction should be determined from the measurement of wind bearings made at the time of the observation.