Tactics and Vectors 98/99
                           

Home

Table of  Contents

Great Circle Hypotheis  

Magnetoclinic Hypothesis

Magnetic-Latitude Hypothesis

Compass Bearings Hypothesis

Suns' Azimuth Hypothesis

Expansion-Contraction Hypothesis

Always Advance Hypothesis

Never Go Back Hypothesis

 

 

Analyses of Pooled Field Data


left arrowarrow leftIndex III b

Tables of Statistical Analyses of  Pooled Data for the 1986, 1987, and 1988, Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migrations in Northwest Georgia.



Descriptive Statistics of pooled field field data Monarch Butterfly migrations in 1987


Table

Title


Table I

Mean Bearing for migrating D. plexippus

Table II

Two Measures of Preferred Bearings of migrating D. plexippus

Table III

Mean Bearings of migrating, D. plexippus for eight wind conditions

Table IV

Mean Headings of straight-flying, migrating, D. plexippus for eight wind conditions

Table V

Proportion of  migrating D. plexippus flying in the low, intermediate, and high altitude bands, for eight wind conditions

Table VI

Proportion of migrating D. plexippus flapping, gliding, and soaring, for eight wind conditions

Table VII

Proportion of migrating D. plexippus soaring in circles for eight wind conditions



Hypothesis Testing on the pooled field data 1986, 1987, and 1988, Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migrations in Northwest Georgia


Table VIII a

Mean Bearings of migrating Danaus plexippus compared to the downwind bearing and the downwind compass sector for eight  Wind Conditions

Table VIII b

Mean Bearings of migrating Danaus plexippus compared to the upwind bearing and the upwind compass sector for eight Wind Conditions

Table IX

Comparsion of Mean Bearing of  migrating Danaus plexippus and two Preferred Bearings   to the  local  GC Route and the local MC Route

Table X

Comparsion of Mean Bearings of migrating Danaus plexippus for eight Wind Conditions  to the local  GC Route and the local MC Route