We know how hard you work on your writing, and we’re giving you a chance to show it off to the world! If you wrote something this year that you’re really proud of, we’d love to read it —because we understand that writing is about more than just marks (although marks are nice too).
Who can participate?
You must be a UTM undergraduate student in good standing.
What can you submit?
- You can submit any writing you’ve done for a credit-bearing UTM course this year, such as:
- an essay
- a review
- a report
- and more!
- Your submission must be no longer than 30 pages in total (including references, tables, graphs, cover page etc.).
- You can submit a paper exactly as you wrote it for a course, or you can revise it before submitting it to us.
- You can submit one paper you wrote by yourself, and/or one paper that you wrote as part of a group (a maximum of two in total).
Entry Instructions & Deadline
Please send submissions via email to email@example.com no later than March 31st, 2023.
- First-place winner(s): $150 Gift Card for the UTM Bookstore
- Second-place winner(s): $75 Gift Card for the UTM Bookstore
- Third-place winner(s): $25 Gift Card for the UTM Bookstore
First Place: Kaitlyn Harris
This was a very well written and interesting examination of modernist poetry supporting a view that only through experimentation and a willingness to disregard conventions can poetry truly thrive. The author examines the uses made of ambiguity and apparently nonsensical imagery in modernist poetry, working sure-footedly through texts by Stein, Breton, Sagawa, and Mallarme. They show how these and other Modernist works are intended to "create a distinct mood, inviting the reader to experience rather than understand." The paper is clearly and elegantly written. Overall, this is an engaging and sophisticated explanation of how modernist poetry defies the standard conventions of grammar and syntax as a means of conveying meaning.
Second Place: Asma Behery
Developmental Portrait: Growth Through Adversity in Higher Education - Developing Confidence, Persistence, Emotion Regulation, and Value for My Personal Goals (PDF)
An intriguing examination of a personal journey exploring the transitional experiences of a student through their first 3 years at UTM. The approach follows a reflective methodology model on the well-known DEAL approach. The author brings theory and practice together in a very thorough and detailed manner: the applications of the various theories to the author's life are clear and impressively laid out. This extends through the author's university voyage, showing how things changed over time and how the author has used their reading to reflect on and understand those changes and hence, their own life. This use of well-contextualized theory as a means of understanding their growth and development throughout their time at UTM makes for an interesting story of personal growth that should be inspiring for any reader.
First Place: Rachel Stubits
Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS): A Review (PDF)
This essay is an erudite and well-researched account of Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, covering the current state of research on possible causes, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment, and doing so in a clear, coherent manner, with the effective utilization of both prose and tables. In addition to presenting the scientific context, the author also makes clear the personal and emotional struggles involved in living with and studying this disorder, which makes the essay a powerful reading experience and one that conveys a sense of urgency for further study of this condition.
Second Place: Veronika Sizova
The Monster in the Looking Glass: Reflections of the Creature in Frankenstein’s Heroines (PDF)
This is an articulate and creative examination of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, taking a novel interpretive approach by making an insightful connection between the struggles of Frankenstein’s monster and the struggles that three of the novel’s female characters face as they cope with being marginalized in a patriarchal society. The author notes that the monster ultimately “lacks a coherent gender role”; nonetheless, this very ambiguity enables it to shed light on the status and behavior of the female characters, just as, by the same token, they shed light on it.
Third Place: Myia Hellmer
Tonian Macroalgae Fossils from the Dolores Creek Formation, Canada. (PDF)
This is a well written paper on the evolution of green algae and their rise to dominance during the Cambrian. The paper is sound in terms of its methodology and clearly represents a formal undergraduate research project. This paper is a clear and well written analysis of a new type of algae, thus making an original contribution to knowledge in the field. The paper’s findings have the potential to impact current understandings of the timing of algae and land plant diversification.
First Place: Cathy Tran
The Craniometric Value of Foramen Magnum Length & Nasal Breadth: A Statistical Exploration of the Significance of Variation Across Sex and Populations (PDF)
Second Place: Ronda Robinson
The Other Brother: A Critical Analysis in Comparison to Frankenstein (PDF)
Third Place: Laurella Cano Jose
Rhetorical Address II: Cities are Not Built for Women (PDF)
First Place: Matthew Kolisnyk
Machine Consciousness: More than just philosophically interesting. (PDF)
Second Place: Myia Hellmer
A Review of the Metamorphic Petrology of the Appalachian Mountains (PDF)
Third Place: Giorgi Buzaladze
Finding a More Effective Way to Address Health Problems in Africa (PDF)
First Place: Andrew O'Brien
Energy Outcomes of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster (PDF)
Second Place: Avleen Grewal
“You are there” paper- Letters from a British Magistrate in India to his friend in England. (PDF)
Third Place: Sughanda Suri
Alderville First Nations: The Journey for Equality (PDF)
First Place: Shaishav Datta, Johnathan Davidson, and Thomas Piekut
An exploratory surface-subsurface trace metal analysis of benthic foraminifera from San Salvador, Bahamas (PDF)
Second Place: Maleeha Iqbal
Eliminating workplace gender segregation does not work (PDF)
Third Place: Yan Liu
Ivan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism (PDF)